According to the report, due to pollution problems, China's largest neoprene manufacturer, Shan Rubber Group, was recently held at a local hearing. It was considered that 'the current technology is difficult to fundamentally solve the problem of environmental pollution and production safety.' Ask the company to relocate. However, the author believes that pollution control is 'governance' rather than 'relocation'.
The relocation of polluting enterprises, as well as the city's eye-catching sky, is undoubtedly a good starting point. However, relocation is not a good way to prevent pollution. At most, it is an expedient measure. The greater possibility is that not only the pollution of the relocated company is not effectively managed, but also new pollution may be triggered. For example, Shan Rubber Group. Since 'difficult to fundamentally solve environmental pollution and production safety hazards', then this 'polluting large family' is still a 'large polluter' after relocation, and the relocation process is not a process of pollution control, but only a major transfer of pollution. If Shan Rubber is relocated, the already contaminated environment will not return to its original shape as the relocation begins, and the original clean site will be immediately contaminated with the relocation. 'The old wound has not been cured, and the new disease has developed.' Therefore, relying on relocation to control pollution is not worth the candle.
Is it true that the pollution of Shan Oak is 'drug-free'? From the author's understanding of the situation, the answer is no. At present, in countries and regions where environmental protection requirements are more stringent than ours, such as Japan, the United States, and the European Union, all have produced chloroprene rubber. We haven't heard of any of them having been relocated because of pollution problems.
Japan Electrochemical Industry Co., Ltd., which uses the acetylene carbide process route, is also not a problem. It seems that there are still ways to control the production of pollution from neoprene on the earth. Therefore, to solve the pollution problem of mountain oaks, we should base ourselves on 'governance' rather than 'relocation'. Besides, our country's land area is limited. Wherever we move there are people. Foreign countries do not want to. We cannot always move on the moon. Therefore, to solve the problem of pollution of companies like Shan Rubber Group, we should make a fuss about 'governance' and not just 'move'.
The relocation of polluting enterprises, as well as the city's eye-catching sky, is undoubtedly a good starting point. However, relocation is not a good way to prevent pollution. At most, it is an expedient measure. The greater possibility is that not only the pollution of the relocated company is not effectively managed, but also new pollution may be triggered. For example, Shan Rubber Group. Since 'difficult to fundamentally solve environmental pollution and production safety hazards', then this 'polluting large family' is still a 'large polluter' after relocation, and the relocation process is not a process of pollution control, but only a major transfer of pollution. If Shan Rubber is relocated, the already contaminated environment will not return to its original shape as the relocation begins, and the original clean site will be immediately contaminated with the relocation. 'The old wound has not been cured, and the new disease has developed.' Therefore, relying on relocation to control pollution is not worth the candle.
Is it true that the pollution of Shan Oak is 'drug-free'? From the author's understanding of the situation, the answer is no. At present, in countries and regions where environmental protection requirements are more stringent than ours, such as Japan, the United States, and the European Union, all have produced chloroprene rubber. We haven't heard of any of them having been relocated because of pollution problems.
Japan Electrochemical Industry Co., Ltd., which uses the acetylene carbide process route, is also not a problem. It seems that there are still ways to control the production of pollution from neoprene on the earth. Therefore, to solve the pollution problem of mountain oaks, we should base ourselves on 'governance' rather than 'relocation'. Besides, our country's land area is limited. Wherever we move there are people. Foreign countries do not want to. We cannot always move on the moon. Therefore, to solve the problem of pollution of companies like Shan Rubber Group, we should make a fuss about 'governance' and not just 'move'.
Wall and Roof Panel Roll Forming Machine
Willing Technology Co., Ltd. , http://www.txrollformingmachine.com