Network behavior implied violent tendency to increase intelligence tendency

Doing Online Avoids "Reduction of Intelligence" and "Rapidity Increasing"

A statement on Weibo is used to describe the disappointing aspect of the current Weibo and even the Internet ecosystem. It is quite appropriate: Listen half, understand the quarter, think twice, and respond twice. For those who understand English, the original text is more neat: Listen half, understand quarter, think zero and react double.

It is necessary to stress that this is the disappointing aspect of the Internet. The new network ecology represented by Weibo has many faces, beautiful, civilized, and free. However, there are not always satisfactory places.

Four verbs and four levels define a chain of action. From hearing comprehension and thinking through understanding, this should be a process of gradual internalization and gradual deepening, but the corresponding degree is gradually decreasing, from half to a quarter, and from a quarter to zero. This actually presents an intellectual decline. Next, from thinking to reaction, it is an externalization process, and the corresponding degree is expanding exponentially. The lack of rational consideration of this release process is undoubtedly imprudent, and it may even be dangerous, which implies a tendency toward increasing violence. It is disturbing that intelligence and behavior are counterproductive.

Or there are rhetoric: Microblogging such cyberspace, this is not a serious place, nothing more than to express good intentions, serious reason why? Such remarks not only underestimated the real influence of cyberspace in the present society, but also devalued the sense of dignity each individual acquires because of his own words and deeds.

"Listen to one half, understand one quarter, think twice, think twice," actually means a chain of logic that is not intended to be responsible or unwilling to be responsible. Not to mention those big words, noble words, who fall into this chain, may wish to ask themselves: I am a reliable person? Not intending to be responsible or unwilling to be responsible, at least not a reliable act.

The "person" in the form of network is also a social behavior. At the input of social actors, "listening" or "looking" or "reading" requires the integrity and accuracy of information. On the output side, forwarding, commenting, and even real-world actions, these "responses" all require some degree of restraint. Between these two ends, although people's minds vary widely, their backgrounds, positions, and aspirations are different, they are not "black boxes" after all. After all, there are some common principles to follow, such as "understanding", such as "thinking."

The evolution of the Internet can be self-regulating, which also means that the antipathy of intelligence and behavior has been corrected. This kind of chain is more dependable: listen to integrity, try to understand, think deeply, and respond with restraint.

Next:Installation, use and regulation of marine diesel generator sets
Previous post: Many people spontaneously traveled to the condolences "beauty driver" Wu Bin